RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:32:21 GMT

  • Next message: Gatherer, D. (Derek): "RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on..."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA19873 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:24:17 GMT
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
    Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:32:21 +1100
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIMEBCCNAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <B691C536.6C52%bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of William Benzon
    > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2001 4:40
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
    >
    >
    > on 1/22/01 9:27 AM, Wade T.Smith at wade_smith@harvard.edu wrote:
    >
    > > On 01/22/01 08:08, Joe E. Dees said this-
    > >
    > >> I was
    > >> correct when I branded you as an unthinking zombic memebot of
    > >> the lowest order, in cognitive thrall to pernicious error.
    > >
    > > Hell, nobody's perfect.
    > >
    > > IMHO, Chris is an (archetypal) astrologer, and everything he says will
    > > work in the proper context and setting, there being a very nice mix of
    > > generality and specificity to all of it.
    > >
    > > I'm willing to enjoy what I see probable about it all.
    > >
    > > But, in the wider cases of Theories of Everything, how many wrongs do
    > > make a right?
    > >
    >
    > Such theories come in two flavors: Those that achieve generality
    > by ignoring
    > details and those that achieve it by paying close attention to novel
    > patterns of detail. The former are worthless, the latter are valuable.
    >

    damn right. The problem is that once you have been through the detail it is
    hard to communicate to those who have not or dont want to.

    Imagine the 'problem' for Joe when he realises (if ever) how it is that
    Astrology is believed at a base level since it develops from fundamental
    metaphorcations of fundamental meanings. It is a metaphor and a good one in
    that it is founded on dichotomisation, as is maths, physics etc etc Problems
    arise when these disciplines are taken too literally; pure mathematics can
    relate to total illusion but it is 'respected'. Astrology can relate to REAL
    social processes but because the literal-minded cannot identify the metaphor
    so it is 'rubbished'.

    It is the relational emphasis that Astrology, Tarot, etc etc capture in
    their symbolisms, the underlying generallty invarient patterns of emotions
    etc., something many 'scientists' seem to have a problem with. This realm is
    REAL, most of the planet's population live in it and so it warrents analysis
    in the context of understanding our species and since it can lack obvious
    logic when viewed from the outside so we have to use a cognitive analysis
    and that points to a species-wide analysis and that is where the template
    comes in.

    An intersting 'discovery' lately has been that the zebrafish has left/right
    hemisphere processing like we do i.e. KNOWN (left bias) vs UNKNOWN (right
    bias) IOW these patterns are possibly in fundamental neurology PRE
    amphibians/reptiles development.

    (oops almost forgot the ref: Liang, J.O. et al (2000) Asymmetric nodal
    signaling in the zebrafish diencephalon positions the pineal organ "
    Development 127, 5101-5112)

    Chris.

     ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
    List Owner: http://www.egroups.com/group/semiosis

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:26:01 GMT