RE: Phonosemantics and parallels in the genome (and elsewhere)

From: Gatherer, D. (Derek) (D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:44:03 GMT

  • Next message: Gatherer, D. (Derek): "RE: Phonosemantics and parallels in the genome (and elsewhere)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA18934 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:25:16 GMT
    Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230010D1A5F@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl>
    From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Phonosemantics and parallels in the genome (and elsewhere)
    Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:44:03 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Jess:
    Question is WHICH side gets WHICH atoms- and if I
    remember correctly you need to expand the other pair to extrapolate what
    atom
    is missing for there to *ideally* be a third bond there as well. Gas code:

    Gas because only O and N (with intermediary H) appear to be involved, Code
    because it is this setup that determines the order of the items on the x,y,z

    axes of the codon-to-amino-acid cube, and thus the polarities which yield
    placement determination for size, shape, solubility, (and charge) of the
    amino acid side chains, quite unexpectedly. Remember I was just fiddling
    around. Serendipity. On and off over the last 15 years or so I've been
    trying
    to figure out WHY this should be. Don't know. Maybe you can tell me.

    Derek:
    This does sound as if it might be interesting from a bioinformatical point
    of view, but I still don't fully understand what you are proposing. Some
    points that need clarifiying -

    >Question is WHICH side gets WHICH atoms

    in an A-T pair, it's 2 Ns on the A and O and N on the T
    in a C-G pair, it's O,N,N on the C and N,N,O on the G

    I also don't understand what you mean by:

    >you need to expand the other pair to extrapolate what atom
    >is missing for there to *ideally* be a third bond there as well

    'expand' the AT pair? What does expand mean here?

    I also can't make the link:

    >it is this setup that determines the order of the items on the x,y,z
    >axes of the codon-to-amino-acid cube,

    I hope I might be able to see this once I can see what your 'setup' is.
    Please do try to explain this further as people in the bioinformatics
    community are interested in this sort of thing.

    For the moment I just can't see how you get from defining the atoms involved
    in the hydrogen bonding to a rearrangement of the codon-amino acid cube.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:27:00 GMT