Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:19:33 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA11673 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 21 Jan 2001 09:22:24 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.143]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny
    Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 04:19:33 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F1779L7dAv2v5jjacuy00003435@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2001 09:19:33.0804 (UTC) FILETIME=[446CAEC0:01C0838B]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny
    >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:06:05 -0600
    >
    >Subject: Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny
    >Date sent: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:26:32 -0500
    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    > > Hi Joe E. Dees --
    > >
    > > >> Does that sound enough like memetic sex for you?
    > > >>
    > > >The propagators or distributors (disSEMINators) of memes could
    > > >be viewed to be the 'male' side, and those prospective candidate
    > > >recipients who select, for whatever reason, to accept or reject them
    > > >could be viewed as the 'female' side.
    > >
    > > Any reason for the femaleness in reference to memes, uh, at all? Not
    >that
    > > I dislike taking sides, I'm usually for the underdog in all contests,
    > > and, not to undermine the dichotomous level of the whole yin/yang thing,
    > > but, I'm more and more not seeing any reason to give anything but 'male'
    > > properties to memes, which I also now see as not being needed _at all_
    >on
    > > the receiving end. The memetic action is the insertion of the unit of
    > > self, and the meme (-plex) is the special cultural meaning given to the
    > > unit by the behavior. That the unit projected by the meme is
    > > taken/received/birthed at all is a function not of a memetic co-process,
    > > but of self-burdened human nature as it is and as it is environed.
    > >
    >Meme as sperm, ayy? That's why I highlighted disSEMINate. But
    >I was speaking of the roles of propagator and recipient; clearly
    >there is a yang/yin complementarity there. However, as regards
    >the meme, what's IN sperm? Why, GENES, of course. In sexual
    >coition, some of the genes from one person are, if they are
    >favorably received, placed in the other person, where they combine
    >with some of the genes from the other to create a new entity. In
    >memetic transfer, some of the memes from one person are
    >communicated to another, and if they are favorably received, they
    >become part of the memeplexure (all the memes and memeplexes)
    >of the recipient, and adapt and are adapted to fit a niche within that
    >gestalt, by means of mutual accommodation and assimilation to
    >modify an already existing entity.
    >
    >
    And what of memetic correspondences to lingam and yoni? Are the organs of
    expression the "male part" kinda like a stamen or penis and the organs or
    reception kinda like a pistil or vagina? The little memetic pollen gets
    brushed onto the memetic stigma and presto...

    Are memetic organisms monoecious or dioecious? Why rule out hermaphroditism
    or androgyny?

    Perhaps self-fertilization is a possibility. Could I impregnate myself with
    an ideational grain of pollen of my own creation and perhaps even serve as
    my own midwife? I think I'm actually doing that right now, but the pollen
    I'm spreading on my own stigmae is possibly pollinating the flowers of many
    others as a byproduct. Shall I now reap what I sow? Hopefully it's a good
    harvest, considering the intellectual drought and all.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:24:07 GMT