Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA05177 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:06:28 GMT Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia? Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:03:20 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010119140157.AAA18242@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>"some concept of _put your own term here_
>could serve eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single
>theory?"
Memetics fits.
So does God.
So does just about anything else sufficiently abstract.
What about 'information' makes it uniquely capable of sitting inside that
sentence?
Is there a unified theory of mind, matter, and meaning? Why are you
separating _those_ three?
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:08:08 GMT