Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:08:41 GMT

  • Next message: William Benzon: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA17025 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:12:08 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.221.62]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:08:41 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F240McUuICI4GcMvnam00001ea9@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2001 15:08:42.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[0C274C80:01C07F05]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    >Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:02:32 -0600
    >
    >Date sent: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:41:57 +0000
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    >From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    >Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:29:58PM -0000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Physicists today aren't giants, for the most part standing on
    >Einstein's
    > > > shoulders, biologists (and all variations thereof) are standing on
    >Darwin's
    > > > shoulders, psychologists (many rather reluctantly) on Freud's
    >shoulders etc.
    > > > etc.
    > >
    > > Tell that to a gathering of academic psychologists and they'll string
    > > you up from the nearest lamppost, Vincent.
    > >
    >Many psychoanalysts still follow one of the biggies or other (Freud,
    >Jung, Adler, Erickson, Rogers, Maslow, Laing, May, Fromm, etc.),
    >or even the behaviorist model (Watson, Skinner, etc.) but there
    >have been a few revolutions in psychology since those days, for
    >instance cognitive psychology and evolutionary psychology.
    >
    How revolutionary is evolutionary psychology? Had no one else asked
    phylogenetic questions about the human psyche before EP stumbled into the
    picture as the drunken cousin of sociobiology? However erroneous, Jung even
    contemplated a phylogenetic component to the psyche long ago. Interestingly,
    evolutionary psychologist David Buss saw fit to include a contribution to a
    very Jungian leaning book called _Evolution of the Psyche_ (1999. Praeger.
    Westport, Connecticut. edited by David Rosen and Michael Luebbert) which
    includes contributions from Jungian author and evolutionary psychiatrist
    Anthony Stevens. Funny how the world turns back around.

    And I wonder how puppet strings might differ between memes and complexes of
    Jung's personal unconscious.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:13:52 GMT