Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Lawrence de Bivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:00:52 GMT

  • Next message: Mark Mills: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA27746 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:54:09 GMT
    Message-ID: <000b01c07a6e$7d6c1380$d563b8d0@wwa>
    From: "Lawrence de Bivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010109112458.02119ac0@pop3.htcomp.net>
    Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:00:52 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net>

    > Sounds like you have started out with a Gatherer-meme understanding. I
    > understand the logic, but think we would be better off with the substrate
    > based Lynch-meme. As it stands, the substrate-free definition makes it
    > very hard to collect empirical data. Empirical data is minimum
    > requirement for starting a scientific study.

    The relative utility of either approach depends, I think, on what one is
    interested in. One can be interested in the wiring of a phone system, or in
    the communication that it allows. For those of use interested in the
    communicational nature of memes and the effect of memes in society, the
    wiring--the substrate--is not of primary importance, nor do we need to know
    a lot about it to understrand how memes operate at the communicative and
    sociological levels. Of course, neuro-biologists may be more interested in
    the substrate than in the 'ideas' that pass through it.

    From a sociological and communicational POV, one can carry out empirical
    research easily, without knowing much about the substrate. For example:
    fidelity of transmission, rates of dissemination, and resistence to
    alteration can all be determined without brain/substrate knowledge.

    - Lawrence

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:55:38 GMT