RE: Who knew genes could get mean?

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:22:48 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Who knew genes could get mean?" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA20066 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:26:13 GMT
Subject: RE: Who knew genes could get mean?
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 07:22:48 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20001221122111.AAA9565@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.107]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Gatherer, D. (Derek) --

    .....and then you said it, too...-

    >There's only one way you can pass on your
    >DNA. But once you succeeded in that, you then have to pass your culture to
    >the resulting progeny. If you don't, then those individuals who inherit
    >your DNA may not inherit your culture. I think that the distinction between
    >culture and DNA is what one would call trivially true.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:28:23 GMT