Re: Self-defense

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 19:35:44 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Our human selves" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA00293 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:47:41 GMT
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 19:35:44 +0000
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Self-defense
Message-ID: <20001214193544.A1120@reborntechnology.co.uk>
References: <20001214015851.AAA9808@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.163]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20001214015851.AAA9808@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.163]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:00:28PM -0500
From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:00:28PM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > Hi Robin Faichney --
    >
    > >By that logic, any disagreement with you regarding evolution is an
    > >attempt at a divine distinction. That logic is what's sometimes called
    > >"tortured". Or, perhaps, "not-logic".
    >
    > I remain open to panspermia.
    >
    > In what way is this 'self' you deny not agreeing with evolution?

    You say the self evolved. I say it didn't. Therefore, I don't agree
    with you regarding evolution. You seem to regard that as good reason
    to accuse me of attempting a divine distinction.

    See what I'm saying? 

    -- 
Robin Faichney
robin@reborntechnology.co.uk

    ===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 14 2000 - 20:49:33 GMT