RE: religion/spirituality

From: Gatherer, D. (Derek) (D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:37:59 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: religion/spirituality"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA07594 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:42:54 GMT
    Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230041108@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl>
    From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: religion/spirituality
    Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:37:59 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Wade:
    Assuming correlates between virology and culture, why do we then have to
    demand mutation? Just because we see certain things in culture 'change'
    rapidly, mostly among teenage fashions and romantic interests, why are we
    thinking everything in culture must breakneck at the same rate?

    Derek:
    It needn't be 'breakneck' at all, just one change in several millenia. Is
    that too much to ask?

    Wade:
    In many ways, judaism has _built-in_ barriers to mutation- this is
    analogous to preventing change in the nutrient mix of a virus, and, if
    the environment don't change, the organism don't change.

    Derek:
    But the cultural environment of Judaism has changed tremendously. From
    Exilic Babylon to Roman colony to Polish shtetl to Brooklyn to modern
    Israel. All very different. And yet none of them triggered the simplest of
    changes that would have had major propagative benefits.

    Wade:
    I don't see any reason to remove judaism, or religion in general, based
    upon judaism's example, from the realm of mind viruses.

    Derek:
    Well, there is another argument based on selection at the level of the
    individual, which I dealt with in my Zygon article a couple of years ago.
    But that isn't the point here. What I'm driving at is, a theory that
    purports to explain religions in terms of the propagative forces within
    them, should be able to account for the extreme variabilty in such
    propagative forces in terms which go beyond 'some are slow, some are fast,
    where's the problem?'.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:45:17 GMT