The "why" meme(s)

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:06:32 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: The "why" meme(s)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA24391 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:34:46 GMT
    Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:06:32 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: The "why" meme(s)
    Message-ID: <20001118120632.A1318@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    I inadvertently deleted the message I'm responding to here, but that
    should be OK because this is not a detailed response and the subject line,
    though changed, is accurate.

    I don't think there's substantial disagreement about "why" in the
    evolutionary context. I'm convinced any apparent disagreement
    is basically semantic: what is the proper use of the word "why"?
    In responding to Vincent talking about "the big why questions", I took a
    hard line, saying the word could only legitimately be used about human
    actions, where asking why something occured means you wonder for what
    reason was it done. But, without taking the time to delve into the
    OED, I guess there's room for disagreement on that semantic issue. So,
    it's OK to ask why a particular feature evolved, because in doing so you
    are not committing yourself to taking the intentional or design stance
    towards evolutionary mechanisms.

    However, I still insist that Vincent's examples, as in "we all wonder
    why" with no context given, are illegimate, essentially meaningless.
    Not only in science is there no place for them -- that's true of modern
    Western philosophy too -- and, IMHO, anywhere else you care to mention,
    as well. Anyone who does "wonder why" at that level of abstraction needs
    to do less wondering and more serious thinking. Or stop mixing their
    wondering with their thinking, and get back to a basic sense of wonder,
    which is not only legitimate, but IMHO essential for mental health.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:36:11 GMT