Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA11554 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:25:20 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:28:30 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Wimsatt on memes at the Uni Pittsburgh Message-ID: <20001024092830.A494@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745AA6@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <B61A2C08.52D7%bbenzon@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <B61A2C08.52D7%bbenzon@mindspring.com>; from bbenzon@mindspring.com on Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:42:42PM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:42:42PM -0400, William Benzon wrote:
>
[On memeticists]
> But they're presenting a popular account of something that simply doesn't
> exist as a well-defined technical discipline.
Of course, serious thinkers don't waste time on definitions... :-)
-- Robin Faichney=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 25 2000 - 11:27:04 BST