Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA06337 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:08:37 +0100 Message-ID: <038401c033c1$b4775cc0$7e21e7d8@proftim> From: "Tim Rhodes" <proftim@speakeasy.org> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: <Insert SUBJECT LINE here> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 05:07:59 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
I've noticed lately (and it has been pointed out to me by others as well)
that the majority of participants on this list seem perhaps unaware of some
of the more elementary niceties of listserver style were the subject heading
is concerned.
What are the possible memetic underpinnings that might cause a group of
intelligent, well-read individuals to habitually neglect to change the
subject heading, despite however many permutation the topic under discussion
may undergo?
(He asked, only partially tongue-in-cheek... ;-)
-Tim Rhodes
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 11 2000 - 21:09:58 BST