Re: the conscious universe

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:30:25 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: the conscious universe" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA20771 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:33:31 +0100
Subject: Re: the conscious universe
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:30:25 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20001002123026.AAA19795@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 10/01/00 15:44, Robin Faichney said this-

    >Consider this: if P then Q; P; therefore Q.

    But life doesn't provide P all the time. Never did, and never will.
    That's empirical science, and if you weren't so scornful of it, you might
    find it quite interesting. As to redundancy, if P then Q seems to provide
    a ton of it....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:35:00 BST