Re: the conscious universe

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 20:51:38 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: the conscious universe" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA18160 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:54:42 +0100
Subject: Re: the conscious universe
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:51:38 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20001001195133.AAA1511@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.187]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Robin Faichney --

    >Show me the flaw in my analysis.

    >My contention is that [something] is only evident in parts, but when
    >the [something] is fully analysed, it makes more sense to attribute it to
    >the whole.

    Show me what is useful in that statement.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 20:56:13 BST