Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA15608 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 30 Sep 2000 15:26:25 +0100 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 09:39:35 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: mysticism etc Message-ID: <20000930093935.A1233@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <20000929123733.AAA26833@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20000929123733.AAA26833@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:37:32AM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:37:32AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 09/28/00 15:05, Robin Faichney said this-
>
> >In a message sent just yesterday you indicated
> >you understood what I meant by the conscious universe.
>
> Yes, Robin, I understand your argument for it. The wrap-around mobius
> argument for it. I understand it completely, just like I understand the
> mobius strip I just made from my EEG.
>
> I also totally reject it as specious and irrelevent for any proof of the
> claim.
>
> The mobius strip shows us a topological two dimensions, but it takes
> three dimensions to do it.
>
> So too with your argument.
I'm sorry, I was wrong in thinking you understood then "relapsed". You
still don't understand.
I'm just having some trouble understanding your difficulty. "You're part
of the universe so the universe is conscious through you" seems very
simple to me.
-- Robin Faichney=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 15:28:16 BST