Re: mysticism etc

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 20:05:07 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: mysticism etc"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA12161 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:55:14 +0100
    Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 20:05:07 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: mysticism etc
    Message-ID: <20000928200507.A678@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20000928174927.AAA8846@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
    In-Reply-To: <20000928174927.AAA8846@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 01:49:28PM -0400
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 01:49:28PM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > On 09/28/00 13:25, Robert G.(Bob) Grimes said this-
    >
    > >For a very valuable site URL I would highly recommend the site of Dr.
    > >Victor Stenger, Physics professor extraordinary at the University of
    > >Hawaii and participant in the recent experiments in Japan where "heavy
    > >neutrinos" were detected and explained.
    >
    > Vic has been a long-time and much-admired participant in the Skeptic-L
    > listserv also, where I and others know him well.
    >
    > He has been an ardent combatant with those who attempt to use the quantum
    > mysteries to further disperse for disinformational purposes their own
    > foggy theories relating to, ahem, among other things, the consciousness
    > of the universe, whatever that is or means....

    You've switched cerebral hemispheres again, Wade. (Or should that be
    "personalities"?) In a message sent just yesterday you indicated
    you understood what I meant by the conscious universe. Of course,
    maybe the temptation to make a cheap jibe was just too strong, so your
    understanding was forgotten. But how rational is that?

    Is skepticism just a gutter for those who don't have what it takes to
    maintain a balanced, upright attitude (for more than a day, anyway)?
    While relaxing in your gutter, do you insist that all those who don't
    share it, must necessarily inhabit the fundamentalist one, on the other
    side of the road? Are these questions rhetorical?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 29 2000 - 07:56:49 BST