Re: The problem with the belief that one is enlightened

From: Lloyd Robertson (hawkeye@rongenet.sk.ca)
Date: Sat Sep 16 2000 - 05:03:31 BST

  • Next message: Lloyd Robertson: "Re: The problem with the belief that one is enlightened" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA24268 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 16 Sep 2000 04:49:46 +0100
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000915220331.007db520@mailhost.rongenet.sk.ca>
X-Sender: hawkeye@mailhost.rongenet.sk.ca (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 22:03:31 -0600
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk, memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: Lloyd Robertson <hawkeye@rongenet.sk.ca>
Subject: Re: The problem with the belief that one is enlightened
In-Reply-To: <EDBBDHLKPOIBDAAA@my-deja.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    At 03:00 PM 14/09/00 -0700, Scott Chase wrote:
    >This could be a critique which cuts both ways, both against mysticism and
    against science. What happens when a healthy respect for a scientific
    perspective becomes elevated into the realm of scientism? Critical views
    yield to crystallization and the possibility of stagnation into dogma.

    Then it is no longer science.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 16 2000 - 04:52:25 BST