Re: Article, A Solipsistic View On Memetics

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 18:09:24 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Article, A Solipsistic View On Memetics - Part 2"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA08371 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 11 Sep 2000 17:41:11 +0100
    Message-ID: <001d01c01c13$1f413f60$b504bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017459F7@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Article, A Solipsistic View On Memetics
    Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:09:24 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Thanks Vincent for the comments.

    > Anyway, I'm drifting off the point here. What I'm trying to get to here
    is
    > that it seems to me that memetics is inherently based in an acceptance of
    > external reality- and our ability (however imperfect) to acquire some
    degree
    > of knowledge about that external reality. Memetics assumes a) that there
    > are social phenomena that spread through any given culture, and that b) it
    > is possible to study the processes and mechanisms of how social phenomena
    > spread through cultures. With solipsism a) is a figment of the
    > imagination, and thus b) cannot follow from it. What then does a
    > solipsistic perspective on memetics actually offer from an empirical point
    > of view- what do we study?
    >

    << Solipsism can help in understanding the selfish nature of memes.
    It seems to me that memes are not just that selfish, and certainly not if we
    take the possibility in account that (as Susan Greenfield points out in the
    serie Brain Story) the motor cortex in the brain was active 2000
    milliseconds
    before a decision was made. This is in my book not selfish but quit " alive
    ".
    And if memes are " alive " and are selfish they would probably act in a
    more
    " solipsistic "- way than one other. Remerber memes will act in their own
    interest, memes will lay down the memetic lineages in order to propagate
    themselves, they will create a world wherein they will strive...and if each
    meme is selfish in nature, than it would act along " solipsistic " -ways.
    It would be the one meme existing, or do we think that memes are aware
    of other memes...in a conscient way !? >>

    Many regards,

    Kenneth

    ( I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 11 2000 - 17:42:16 BST