Re: solipsistic view on memetics

From: LJayson@aol.com
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 00:57:02 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: solipsistic view on memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA05786 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:00:07 +0100
    From: <LJayson@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <32.9e9e76c.26ed79ce@aol.com>
    Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:57:02 EDT
    Subject: Re: solipsistic view on memetics
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    CC: Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 117
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    In a message dated 9/10/00 1:23:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
    hemidactylus@my-Deja.com writes:

    << The way we, as babies, come into this world genetically prewired to start
    processing chunks of information and to perceive reality is about as far as I
    would go. There's an objective world "out there". but the way we address it
    has hints of processing and some subjective components.
     
     Scott "a figment of your active solipsistic imagination" Chase >>

    Hi Scott --

    I am approaching memetics with a background in clinical psychology.
    The above segment from your e-mail was all that I could comprehend
    ---my problem, certainly not yours.

    You did motivate me to look up the word 'solipsism' in Britannica:

    <<solipsism

    in philosophy, formerly, moral egoism (as used in the writings of Immanuel
    Kant), but now, in an epistemological sense, the extreme form of subjective
    idealism that denies that the human mind has any valid ground for believing
    in the existence of anything but itself. The British idealist F.H. Bradley,
    in Appearance and Reality (1897), characterized the solipsistic view as
    follows:

    "I cannot transcend experience, and experience is my experience. From this it
    follows that nothing beyond myself exists; for what is experience is its (the
    self 's) states."

    Presented as a solution of the problem of explaining human knowledge of the
    external world, it is generally regarded as a reductio ad absurdum. The only
    scholar who seems to have been a coherent radical solipsist is Claude Brunet,
    a 17th-century French physician. >> end of article

    Solipsism is an interesting concept to contemplate, but the words
    ' reductio ad absurdum' relegates it to the garbage heap where it
    most likely belongs.

    Best wishes,
    Len in Reno, NV - USA

      
       

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 11 2000 - 01:01:13 BST