RE: Dolphin philosophy Fw: Animal Intelligence

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Aug 16 2000 - 13:19:54 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence H. de Bivort: "Re: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA00875 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:22:19 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017459A8@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Dolphin philosophy Fw: Animal Intelligence
    Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:19:54 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    thankd for this sound very interesting.

    > ----------
    > From: Anne Hansen
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 12:28 pm
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re:Dolphin philosophy Fw: Animal Intelligence
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Off track slightly to communication but I thought this may be of
    > interest..
    > Does any one know of other such experiments
    >
    > Anne
    >
    >
    > To: <SCIENCE-MATTERS@YOUR.abc.net.au>
    > Sent: Monday, 14 August 2000 11:38
    > Subject: Animal Intelligence
    >
    >
    > > There seems to be a 'work to rule' policy on the part of the listserv on
    > > weekends. I sent the following message on Sunday but it was delivered to
    > a
    > > black hole in cyberspace, I suspect.
    > >
    > >
    > > In the Weekend Australian of 5/6 Aug 00 there is a three-page article
    > about
    > > intelligence in animals. The article also discusses whether or not
    > 'human
    > > rights' should be extended to animals, and if so, to which animals.
    > >
    > > The most interesting part (to me) of the article is the opening few
    > paras.
    > > An experiment was done to determine if dolphins were capable of
    > realising
    > > that a person had a belief that they knew to be false. The experiment
    > was
    > > conducted as follows:
    > >
    > > Two boxes were placed in a tank. A fish would be in one, the other would
    > be
    > > empty. The handler would tap on one box--the one that had a fish in it.
    > If
    > > the dolphin touched that box with his/her nose, the fish would be given
    > to
    > > the dolphin. But if the dolphin touched the wrong box--no fish. After a
    > > while the dolphins learned that the box that their handler tapped was
    > the
    > > one containing the fish, so they would touch this one.
    > >
    > > When they were familiar with this, the handler would pretend to be
    > > distracted. While the handler was facing the other way, a person would
    > > exchange the boxes. The handler would then turn back and tap on a box.
    > The
    > > dolphins then had to choose between the 'correct box' (assuming that the
    > > handler did not realise the exchange had taken place) and the box that
    > he
    > > tapped. Although the scientific paper to be submitted to a peer-reviewed
    > > journal has not been through the refereeing process, according to this
    > > article the statistics indicated a significant number of correct answers
    > > (ie, that the dolphins were aware of the 'false belief' of the handler,
    > and
    > > so touched the box he had not tapped).
    > >
    > > The article states that 'Such tests have been recognised as an indicator
    > of
    > > advanced cognitive abilities in humans since the early 1980s'.
    > Generally,
    > > children get tests similar to this wrong until they are about 4-6 years
    > of
    > > age. Understanding such false beliefs is thought to depend on making an
    > > inference about a mental state in someone else, thereby (perhaps)
    > indicating
    > > an awareness of 'self' and 'others'. One scientist is quoted as saying:
    > > ''This is a test (that) if replicated, indicates that we are not the
    > only
    > > sentient beings on earth.'
    > >
    > > Even allowing for the journalistic hyperbole, I believe that this is a
    > > fascinating and potentially very important finding.
    > >
    > > Further into the article is neurological/anatomical evidence that the
    > great
    > > apes may have an awareness of self. Cells in the frontal lobe of people
    > that
    > > serve no known function other than as a centre of self-awareness have
    > now
    > > been isolated from the frontal lobes of chimpanzees, gorillas and
    > > orang-outangs.
    > > Chris Forbes-Ewan
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 16 2000 - 13:23:19 BST