RE: Hymenoepimecis

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:53:28 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Hymenoepimecis" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA24150 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:56:09 +0100
Subject: RE: Hymenoepimecis
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 07:53:28 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000802115331.AAA16551@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.120]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Mark M. Mills made this comment not too long ago --

    >I bought the example up because an artifact was involved, and artifacts
    >produced by environmental stimulation (injection here) might satisfy those
    >who use 'artifacts' as the prerequiste for culture. Obviously, this
    >wouldn't satisfy those using (e) or (f).

    It doesn't satisfy those who require intention before artifice, either.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:57:06 BST