Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA11808 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 28 Jul 2000 02:20:11 +0100 Message-Id: <200007280117.VAA03312@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net> From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:22:15 -0500 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: Simple neural models In-reply-to: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIIEKNCHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> References: <200007272029.QAA16790@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Simple neural models
Date sent: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:00:39 +1000
Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
> > Of Joe E. Dees
> > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2000 6:34
> > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> > Subject: RE: Simple neural models
> >
> >
> > Actually, your map does not adhere to the territory; I have provided
> > numerous irrefutable counterexamples to your claim that the two
> > are contiguous.
> >
>
> you have provided no such thing; I have easily demonstrated that your
> so-called counter examples are refutable.
>
Okay, refute the irretrieveably triadic phenomenological structure of
perception (focus/field/fringe), the irreduceably triadic structure of
semiotic signification (sign/signifire/signified), the irrefuteably triadic
hermeneutic structure of communication (code/carrier/message),
and the three distinct indices of received perceptual content
(frequency, amplitude and waveform).
> >
> > > work harder please or dont respond at all, you are still wasting time.
> > >
> > You are so right; you are a waste of every one's time here. You
> > have no grasp of the complexities inherent in neural net
> > architectonics, and only an adolescent ability to woof and strut the
> > Church Lady's Superior Dance, which is a genuinely asinine
> > exercise, seeing as it is issuing from someone of such limited,
> > stunted and stultified abilities as yourself.
> > >
> cant stop the insults can you. I forgive you though, it is obvious that you
> feel threatened in some way; to change you position would be too much for
> you to deal with so you throw 'shit' :-)
>
Your forgiveness is neither requested nor desired, seeing as how
you only see the insults you catch, not those you throw (typically
myopic of you). You cannot change your position, even though I
have provided numerous empirical counterexamples to it which you
have not (and cannot) resolve, because you have invested too
much emotional capital in it, and probably a good deal of your self-
concept as well. As dense, obtuse and insipid as your supposed
epiphanous illumination sadly showcased on your website is, I still
cannot consider such personal committment a waste of cognitive
resources, because to waste them you must have them. You are
Sir Winston Churchill's definition of a fanatic: someone who won't
change his mind and cannot change the topic.
>
> may you live in interesting times.
>
May you somehow become interesting.
>
>
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 28 2000 - 02:21:03 BST