RE: Simple neural models

From: Mark M. Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Wed Jul 26 2000 - 17:13:42 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: Simple neural models"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA08274 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:16:19 +0100
    Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000726111614.00e62100@pop3.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
    Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:13:42 -0400
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: RE: Simple neural models
    In-Reply-To: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040E6A@DELTA>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 09:26 AM 7/26/00 +0200, you wrote:
    >a) your attempt to explain it in terms of an electronics-type analogy
    >requires you to postulate things about kinases and/or other cellular
    >components which won't stand up to scrutiny by molecular biologists.
    >
    >b) you still don't have a convincing mechanism for your hypothesised
    >'memory' effect
    >
    >c) you are not justified in attaching the label 'memetic' to a process just
    >because it is not genetic. Besides, your gene knockout example above
    >actually argues the case for _greater_ genetic determination, not less.

    Derek,

    These are reasonable objections based on your difficulty with Koch's
    transistor like kinases.

    Points 'a' and 'b' are strongly linked. If kinases have transistor like
    properties, the memory effect follows. In a way, 'c' also hangs upon
    proof of 'a' as well. Without a memory mechanism at the molecular level, I
    have no basis for a non-genetic regulatory structure based on binary charge
    states at synapse membranes (neural memetics).

    As to the knock-out experiment supporting a gene control model, my
    interpretation assumes Koch's transistor analogy holds. The hypothetical
    binary memory system requires proteins produced by genetic action. I don't
    want to claim it is 'extra-genetic.' I'm only suggesting the conductivity
    states (assuming one accepts the transistor analogy) are the result of
    neural dynamics (electrical waves, charge dynamics, etc) and established
    after the system starts generating random electrical oscillations as a
    byproduct of stochastic chemical combinations. In this model, genes do not
    establish conductivity states, only the media/substrate.

    Again, if the transistor analog doesn't exist, the model falls.

    I don't have a copy of Koch's book handy, so it will be a while before I
    can do a better job recapping Koch's description of the electrical
    properties of autophosphorylating kinases. I've emailed Koch, but he is out
    on a archaeological dig until August. I'll post more when I find something
    to quote.

    Mark

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 26 2000 - 17:17:11 BST