RE: Another Irreduceable Triad

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 19:03:54 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Gender bias for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA01652 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:01:53 +0100
    Message-Id: <200007241759.NAA04577@mail6.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:03:54 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Another Irreduceable Triad
    In-reply-to: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIGEIPCHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    References: <200007240225.WAA08435@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Another Irreduceable Triad
    Date sent: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:08:04 +1000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > Joe,
    > I have worked my way through your recent postings and find nothing that is
    > notworthy; it all rings of someone asserting their own perspective but from
    > a point of ignorance.
    >
    A succinct psychological projection of your own circumstances.
    >
    > For my perspective I have supplied references etc and
    > all you can do is make some amazing mis-interpretations and then refer me to
    > some paper you wrote based on an abstract semiotic perspective without
    > addressing the neurology that is behind all of this. Your position seems to
    > be extremely rigid and since you are not prepared to read the references etc
    > then you are, to me, a waste of time.
    >
    You waste the time of most folks on the list, which is exactly why
    the cognoscenti refuse to engage you. They're just hoping you'll
    burn yourself out of verbiage and exit the field, and figure that,
    although you are incapable of doing any good here, at least they
    can filter you or employ their delete key so you will not do them
    harm via time wasted reading your bizarre dreck.
    >
    > Your innuendos and snide remarks reflect an individual living in some sort
    > of fear. Get out more. Read more. Your comments about the library you have
    > does not impress me, you probably buy books but dont read them; you store
    > them, collect them and so feel that they are part of you. Get real. Get
    > serious. Perhaps then we can have some sort of discussion without all of the
    > crap; all I see from you so far is ranting and raving.
    >
    Obviously you are cognitively blind.
    >
    > ciao,
    >
    > Chris.
    > ------------------
    > Chris Lofting
    > websites:
    > http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    > http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 24 2000 - 19:02:46 BST