Re: What Meaning Means (was: RE: presentation)

From: Robin Faichney (robin@mmmi.org)
Date: Sun 18 Jun 2006 - 15:53:32 GMT

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "Re: What Meaning Means"

    Sunday, June 18, 2006, 10:17:12 AM, I wrote:

    > You're equating memes with meaning, which is simply wrong. You should
    > go right back and read the last chapter of The Selfish Gene again. Or
    > for the first time, as the case may be. I don't know where you get the
    > nerve to lecture people in a specialist area of which you are so
    > woefully ignorant.

    For the second time in two days I find myself having to post a retraction. Yesterday it was just fuzzy thinking, this morning I was in a bad mood and over-reacted. It does seem obvious to me that memetics is not about meaning, but of course some people do take the opposite view, and it's probably not the case that simply re-reading TSG would instantly change their minds. Dawkins was guilty of fuzzy thinking himself, in my opinion, when he included ideas in that famous list of examples.

    -- 
    Best regards,
     Robin                            mailto:robin@mmmi.org
    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 18 Jun 2006 - 16:15:48 GMT