Re[2]: Environment for memes (lost sending again)

• Previous message: John Wilkins: "Re: new review of memetics/sociobiology/EP"
• In reply to: Kate Distin: "Re: Environment for memes (lost sending again)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Friday, February 3, 2006, 7:41:42 PM, Kate wrote:

> I wonder what
> memes have to do to become so securely entrenched and get this level of
> mental/emotional protection?

I'd say they need to get incorporated into the self-plex, so that protecting them is like self-preservation. "I belong to the Party!" or
"Bush's success is my success, his failure is my failure."

-- 
Best regards,
 Robin                            mailto:robin@mmmi.org
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

• Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: new review of memetics/sociobiology/EP"
• Previous message: John Wilkins: "Re: new review of memetics/sociobiology/EP"
• In reply to: Kate Distin: "Re: Environment for memes (lost sending again)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 04 Feb 2006 - 11:11:55 GMT