From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Mon 16 Jan 2006 - 16:32:58 GMT
Kate wrote:
<<The same point stands in response to Kenneth's question whether religion
is a mental disease. Language like this (or like Dawkins's "mental
virus") implies that religion is something harmful and misguided, but
neurological explanations of religion are no more relevant to the question
of God's existence than evolutionary explanations are.>>
Is there really a question about God's existence among scientists? I don't
see how it is possible to postulate the supernatural and then claim to
explain and predict phenomena.
Richard Brodie
www.memecentral.com
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 16 Jan 2006 - 16:53:56 GMT