From: Derek Gatherer (d.gatherer@vir.gla.ac.uk)
Date: Fri 06 Jan 2006 - 09:14:30 GMT
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5757/34
"Excerpts from the decision" are at the bottom of the page, including:
1) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of
science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation;
2) The argument of irreducible complexity,
central to ID, employs the same flawed and
illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980s, and;
3) ID's negative attacks on evolution have been
refuted by the scientific community. … It has not
generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it
been the subject of testing and research. …
Argument 2 addresses Hoyle's Fallacy, as
previously mentioned ad nauseam by me.....
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 06 Jan 2006 - 14:03:09 GMT