From: Derek Gatherer (d.gatherer@vir.gla.ac.uk)
Date: Wed 09 Nov 2005 - 08:46:05 GMT
> A species
> > is self-determined to the extent that an
> > intelligently chosen functional
> > adaptation has generated a structural variation to
> > be selected or not by the
> > environment.
>Intelligently chosen?
>[snip]
>Why do psychological features that
>evolved within one branch of great apes apply to
>distinct branches such as plants or bacteria? I just
>don't get it.
Nor do I. And there's also a deeper problem with the notion of an
kind of "chosen" functional adaptation (intelligent or otherwise),
which is that there is no empirical evidence for such a process,
despite a century of failed attempts (from Kammerer to Steele via
Michurin and Lysenko) to find it. The reason why the cornfields of
Mid-West North America fed a rapidly expanding population while those
of the Ukraine failed to keep up with a declining one, are largely
due to the difference between the practical results obtained by
(Mendelian) US scientists as opposed to their (Lysenkoist) Soviet counterparts.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 09 Nov 2005 - 09:08:20 GMT