RE: (part 2) Philosophy of Technology: scale and meaning; sameness and difference

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 09:51:31 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Memes and sexuality"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA09919 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:36:11 +0100
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: (part 2) Philosophy of Technology: scale and meaning; sameness and difference
    Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:51:31 +1000
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIOEFDCHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20000713160438.007ae180@megalink.net>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Kurt Young
    > Sent: Friday, 14 July 2000 6:05
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: RE: (part 2) Philosophy of Technology: scale and meaning;
    > sameness and difference
    >
    >
    >
    > This, That That, This
    >
    > That, That This, This
    >
    >
    > abyss
    >
    >

    :-) yes, that (!) is what Taoism, Zen etc emphasise, dont get into 'this',
    dont go past the moment since you move into illusion etc., but to get to
    this understanding you endup having to go through 'that'. :-)

    One of the increasingly common 'problems' in humans is depression and it
    turns out that that part of our brain more concerned with going past the
    moment is related to causing depression (as well as 'god in the head'
    syndrome but not being god more having a relationship with god. Being god is
    more linked to schizophrenia etc and so the psychosis side of things rather
    than neurosis.). Our culture is strongly immersed in DIFFERENCE and so going
    past the 'one'. On the other hand, sticking to the 'one' can, from a social
    categorisation context, lead to the expression of psychosis etc.

    Fundamentalism, expressed in its religous format, has shown some 'novel'
    forms with emphasis on the miraculous, seemingly magical powers etc. Taoism
    emphasises more of favouring of a 'way' than favouring a 'being' and so is
    not so 'extreme' as the more 'being' oriented. In taoism the faith is in a
    dynamic not in a static.

    best,

    Chris.
    ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 14 2000 - 09:36:58 BST