Re: The evolution of "evolution"

From: Scott Chase (osteopilus@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu 27 Oct 2005 - 13:57:28 GMT

Next message: Dace: "Me against the meme"

Previous message: Scott Chase: "Re: Re[3]: The evolution of "evolution""
In reply to: Joel.M Dimech: "Re: The evolution of "evolution""
Next in thread: Dace: "Re: The evolution of "evolution""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

--- "Joel.M Dimech" <j.marie.dimech@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
>
> Durkheim was not all wrong stating that social facts
> might come to a life of their own.
>
Alas, a list relevant topic emerges on this thread :-)

Ted may be influenced by a different set of socifacts than some of the rest of us. Are these socifacts compelling him to increase their prevalence in the noosphere?

__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Dace: "Me against the meme"
Previous message: Scott Chase: "Re: Re[3]: The evolution of "evolution""
In reply to: Joel.M Dimech: "Re: The evolution of "evolution""
Next in thread: Dace: "Re: The evolution of "evolution""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 27 Oct 2005 - 14:18:09 GMT