Re: Hollywood Economics: putting math to memes

From: Robin Faichney (robin@mmmi.org)
Date: Sun 14 Aug 2005 - 15:48:18 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Aaron Lynch"

    Friday, August 12, 2005, 6:15:37 PM, William wrote:

    > A review of

    > Arthur De Vany, Hollywood Economics, Routledge, 2004.

    > De Vany presents a profound and imaginative treatment of the economics of
    > the movie business, one that has implications, not only for similar
    > businesses, such as publishing and music, but for our understanding of the
    > dynamics of culture. When Richard Dawkins coined the term "meme" he
    > unwittingly paved the way for tons and tons of sexy but shallow commentary
    > on human culture. Though that is not what he set out to do ­ "meme" never
    > shows up in the book ­ De Vany has given mathematical form to the behavior
    > of movie memes and has demonstrated that it is the people who are in change,
    > not the memes.

    It's probably just me, but I couldn't see why you said that, in what followed. Could you give me a brief pointer?

    -- 
    Best regards,
     Robin                            mailto:robin@mmmi.org
    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 15 Aug 2005 - 10:50:20 GMT