From: Alan Patrick (a.patrick@btinternet.com)
Date: Sat 16 Jul 2005 - 00:12:16 GMT
Dunno if anyone saw this?
Alan
Baby names drift like genes
The selection of baby names follows a predictable mathematical pattern
(Pic: U.S. National Institutes of Health)
Mathematics and basic population genetics can be used to predict that no
matter how unusual your baby name is today, it has a chance of becoming very
common in the future.
The claim by Dr Alex Bentley of University College London and Matthew Hahn
of Duke University in the U.S. are published in the June issue of the Royal
Society's Biology Letters.
"Some parents today who invent some original name for their baby, like
'Grast', could - through simple random chance - unwittingly be determining
the names of thousands of children 10 years from now," said Bentley, of the
college's Centre for the Evolutionary Analysis of Cultural Behaviour, which
uses biological ideas to understand cultural change.
Using British and U.S. government data, Bentley and Hahn tracked the
popularity of the top 1,000 first names for baby girls and boys in the U.S.
for every decade in the 20th century.
They found that a few names were thousands of times more popular than the
majority with many uncommon names. They said the distribution followed an
"elegant mathematical function," called a power law, that is maintained over
100 years, even though the population is growing.
Hahn and Bentley developed a model which closely predicts the distribution
of name popularity over the last century. The model is based on the
population genetics concept of 'random genetic drift', in which the
frequency of genes in a population fluctuates according to chance, and where
there is only a small population of breeding parents.
In their simulation, people randomly copied existing baby names, only
occasionally inventing new names. "By its simplicity, this model provides a
powerful null hypothesis for cultural change," wrote the researchers.
"We can't predict which newly-invented name will be the name for thousands
of babies a decade from now, but we can with all certainty predict that some
baby somewhere is being given an original name that will someday become
highly popular," said Bentley. "Through basic population genetics, we can
predict about how common the most popular one will be."
"We found that girls have a 40% higher chance of getting a unique name than
boys," said Hahn. "I'd bet that this has a lot to do with life in a
patriarchal society, where boys more often get traditional names. It might
also show the 'playground effect' - boys with unusual names are going to be
teased mercilessly."
The researchers argue their study has implications for cultural changes in
general. "In the social sciences, there is currently no consensus on the
mechanism by which cultural elements come and go in human society," they
wrote.
While social scientists often assume there is a 'reason' why something
becomes popular, they argue that sometimes things may just become popular by
"dumb luck" - and acquire their meaning afterward.
"For example, some first names have upper- or working-class connotations,"
the researchers said. "They probably became popular in their respective
economic classes before becoming stereotypical."
They also add that random copying could potentially explain power law
distributions in other cultural realms, including the links on the World
Wide Web.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 16 Jul 2005 - 00:29:10 GMT