Re: Memes and sexuality

From: Aaron Lynch (aaron@mcs.net)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2000 - 17:14:37 BST

  • Next message: Elmo Recio: "Re: [Memes and sexuality]"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA02295 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:18:58 +0100
    Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000711104525.02175e80@popmail.mcs.net>
    X-Sender: aaron@popmail.mcs.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
    Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:14:37 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Aaron Lynch <aaron@mcs.net>
    Subject: Re: Memes and sexuality
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0007110839110.2376-100000@koko.umd.edu>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D310174590F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 08:41 AM 7/11/00 -0400, Lawrence H. de Bivort wrote:

    >I wonder if the repression of overt sexuality among humans comes to a
    >certain extent from a desire to put some distance between ourselves and
    >'mere' animals, to prove to ourselves that we are not 'animals.'
    >
    >- Lawrence

    Lawrence,

    I suspect that the tendency to view sexuality as a "lower animal" drive
    results from the proliferation of intense taboos rather than the other way
    around. In Thought Contagion, I have expressed a variety of hypotheses
    about how such taboos tend to cause more reproduction and higher child
    inculcation rates, and that the taboos are a result of simple propagation
    forces acting over long periods of time. Rodney Stark, in The Rise of
    Christianity has found evidence that reproduction differentials indeed
    played a part in the early spread of sexually repressive Christianity.

    Interestingly, some of the criticisms of these hypotheses have made subtle
    or not so subtle appeals to the still very widespread sex taboos and
    sex-talk taboos. People who hold various levels of sex-talk taboos may be
    led to scoff at scientific hypotheses that can only be expressed using
    fairly explicit language, and this fact can have Machiavellian usefulness
    to people who do not themselves hold such intense taboos. I suspect that
    some of the critics who have felt genuinely offended by the notion that
    their taboos came from such mechanical processes have repressed any mention
    of it, however--and found other ways to assail the hypotheses. Such are the
    hazards of taking up emotionally loaded subjects.

    --Aaron Lynch

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 11 2000 - 17:19:46 BST