RE: Durkheim redux

From: Price, Ilfryn (I.Price@shu.ac.uk)
Date: Tue 19 Apr 2005 - 17:47:16 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: Durkheim redux"

     

    Kate wrote
     
    >

    I don't think it's off the topic: I'm pretty sure it is a root to memes.
      As you say, the capacity to represent, to carry the idea from one context to another, is crucial. I believe that humans' (almost certainly unique) ability to metarepresent - or in other words to carry the idea from one representational system to another; to reflect on
    *how* it is represented - is the key to memes themselves. But there seem to be degrees/types of representation, with some creatures capable of much simpler types than others, and I'm sure there's a spectrum here.>

    Yes, we can verbalise a greater range of sounds and make artefacts - the naked, talking, tool making ape. Those abilities may be exaptions but they created an environment for memetic replication not apparently matched elsewhere in our planet's biosphere. The rest is history (or pre history).
      If
     
     
    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 19 Apr 2005 - 18:09:49 GMT