Re: Durkheim redux

From: Bill Spight (bspight@pacbell.net)
Date: Sat 09 Apr 2005 - 16:25:58 GMT

Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Durkheim redux"

Previous message: Steve Wallis: "RE: Durkheim and the Wrong Marker"
In reply to: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Next in thread: Chris Taylor: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Reply: Chris Taylor: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Reply: Scott Chase: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Reply: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear Kenneth,

> But what if the individual ( personal) memeset is working totally on its
> own, with no outside connection or attachment !?
> What then !?

Then we do not have memes, because memes are cultural.

Ciao,

Bill

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Previous message: Steve Wallis: "RE: Durkheim and the Wrong Marker"
In reply to: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Next in thread: Chris Taylor: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Reply: Chris Taylor: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Reply: Scott Chase: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Reply: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Durkheim redux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 09 Apr 2005 - 16:43:35 GMT