From: Scott Chase (osteopilus@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri 25 Mar 2005 - 03:07:07 GMT
--- Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Dear Kate,
>
> > I agree with you, by the way, on the dangers of
> looking for a memetic
> > analogy for every passing genetic detail, and hope
> I don't fall into
> > this trap too often. I'm interested to hear that
> my use of the term
> > "recessive" has raised this sort of question-mark
> for you. I
> > certainly wasn't thinking so precisely in terms of
> loci and a
> > particular meme *always* being recessive. You
> have made me wonder
> > whether a different term might have been better -
> I'll ponder this
> > further.
>
>
> As I suggested in my just previous note about roles
> in interpersonal
> games, external circumstances may evoke behavior
> which is unusual for
> the person and the role or roles they play. It does
> not take the
> acquisition of new memes for this to happen. If you
> want to keep to the
> genetic analogy, "unexpressed" might fit better than
> "recessive".
>
If people learn all the roles of a game even if they
only play one, these other roles are stored in memory
and can be recalled later when the situation warrants.
"Unexpressed" yes, but not expressing oneself is
something that need not require a genetic analogy.
There are times when I'm tongue tied during a
conversation and...ummm...can't quite remember what
would be best to say until later. I have difficulty
expressing myself at that moment. There's probably
lots of dormant memories we all carry which await the
proper cue to be "ecphorized" (cough, cough). These
"traces" are currently not expressed. Are they
recessive? Are those that are expressed dominant?
I also contrasted truth value to
dominance/recessiveness using the flat earth example.
When looking at memetic alleles for origins is
creationism or evolutionism dominant or recessive?
Creationism can be likened to the flat earth notion,
yet quite a few more people believe in a literal
Genesis account than believe in a flat earth and this
notion is competive with the notion of evolution in
the "noosphere". One could even go as far as saying
there are multiple alleles for creationism, starting
with young versus old earth creationists and a variant
of Paleyism has emerged known as intelligent design. I
would be as oppsed to looking at variant forms of
ideas as aleles as I would using tems like dominance
and recessiveness when looking at relations between
these alleles. Truth value applies to certain
situations, but is itself limited, since we are
talking beliefs based upon faith. OK enough of that
tangent.
Was the notion of continental drift recessive until
something changed which made it dominant? Did the
plate tectonics meme modify the effect of the
continental drift memetic allele? We could ponder
these analogies til we're blue in the face, but I'm
not sure, at the end of the day, that any light has
been cast upon the topic of cultural evolution.
Like Kate I'll need to ponder analogizing the
relations between alleles at a locus in terms of
dominance, recessiveness, codominance etc in memetic
terms. It's been a while since I've had to really
think about molecular genetics, so I'd defer to
practicing biologists like Chris Taylor and Derek
Gatherer on this one. There's something that seems
intuitivenley wrong to me using terms like dominant
and recessive when speaking of representations. I'd
imagine there to be some serious disanalogies. I
already exploded a literal usage of memetic alleles
using an armchair version of the Punnett square for
heterozygous parentage. Taken too literally, in this
case, 25% of offspring could be expected to be
homozygous for the "recessive" memetic allele (ff) and
have the flat earth phenotype. But I'd be interested
in hearing someone explore disanalogies wrt molecular
genetics wrt relations between alleles at a locus...
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 25 Mar 2005 - 03:24:07 GMT