From: Kate Distin (memes@distin.co.uk)
Date: Thu 24 Mar 2005 - 09:14:00 GMT
Scott - I really wasn't careful enough with my phraseology here: like
Lawrence, I even own the compact OED (and can't even claim not to have
done so at the time this was written)! Of course what I had in my head
was a picture of the normal-sized text version of the OED - which is not
much use to readers with no direct access to the inside of my head . . .
Kate
>Kate:
>
>When you (on pages 61-2) talk about biological
>constraints on culture you assert: "...the meme for
>binding the whole of the Oxford English Dictionary
>into one huge, unmanageable volume would be doomed to
>failure because we are not physically large enough to
>handle it."
>
>AFAIK, the Compact OED is such a hopeful monster. See:
>
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0198612583/qid=1111647590/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_6/104-4335505-5305529?v=glance&s=books
>
>According to this write-up, this Compact OED is not an
>abridgement and thankfully comes with magnifying
>lense. I'd prefer the multi-volume set with regular
>print size myself, because the print is painfuly tiny
>for the Compact OED, but it does exist.
>
>Apparently the leash on culture is looser than you
>thought, but one might want to be careful with the
>Compact OED. If it does get you with the severe eye
>strain, it might slip from your hand and injure your
>foot.
>
>
>
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 24 Mar 2005 - 09:31:05 GMT