Re: From the Moderator of the memetics list: Warning about relevance!

From: Chris Taylor (christ@ebi.ac.uk)
Date: Thu 02 Dec 2004 - 23:17:08 GMT

  • Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: From the Moderator of the memetics list: Warning about relevance!"

    Omg we've gone all 'meta'...

    What do you call the theory that someone can have a theory about your theory of mind? Quis custodiet ipsos custodies yadda yadda.

    Incidentally the 'engineering' is just more blind selection in the end. We're trying to alter direction, yes; but driven by what? Our internal environments are just yet more memes (in a broader definition) affected and effecting, jostling and hybridising.

    Cheers, Chris.

    Keo Ormsby wrote:
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Keith Henson" <hkhenson@rogers.com>
    >
    >>At 11:56 AM 01/12/04 +0000, you wrote:
    >>
    >>>Dear memetics discussants,
    >>>
    >>>Please can I remind you that this list is for the discussion
    >
    > of matters
    >
    >>>relating to memes and memetics. Where this degenerates into
    >
    > discussions
    >
    >>>about politics (USA, Cuba, Israel, Animal rights etc.) this
    >
    > should be
    >
    >>>carried on OFF this list (i.e. privately or via another
    >
    > forum).
    >
    >>>Individuals who ignore this will eventually (after warnings,
    >
    > pleas etc.)
    >
    >>>be ejected form the list. If there is a widespread
    >
    > irrelevance the list
    >
    >>>will be closed. You have been warned.
    >>>
    >>>As they say: we thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
    >>
    >>Have I been missing a lot of postings? The previous post was
    >
    > over two
    >
    >>weeks ago.
    >>
    >>As for the above topics, I do think people should be more
    >
    > specific about
    >
    >>tying such topics back into memetics and evolutionary
    >
    > psychology. EP seems
    >
    >>to me to be the lower strata that memetics rests on.
    >>
    >>Why for example do animal rights memes spread in populations?
    >
    > They
    >
    >>obviously don't spread in *all* populations and didn't at all
    >
    > until recent
    >
    >>historical times so what are the differences? And how does the
    >>differential spread of animal rights memes relate to the
    >
    > substrate of
    >
    >>evolved human brains? It is almost certainly a side effect of
    >
    > something
    >
    >>else since animal rights memes would be rather counter survival
    >
    > to hunter
    >
    >>gatherers, but a side effect of what?
    >>
    >>I have some ideas along this line. Anyone else?
    >>
    >>Keith Henson
    >>
    >>PS. Politics is even more related. If the psychological
    >
    > forces spreading
    >
    >>memes inside the US and Iraq were understood at least we might
    >
    > be able to
    >
    >>suggest something useful.
    >>
    >
    >
    > Perhaps we could analyze the memetic relevance of this whole
    > situation. The list is a meme space where competition and
    > selection is taking place, and the more successful memes get
    > replicated and thrive in threads. Now this particular list has
    > the following selective pressures: All of the replicating agents
    > (us) have an interest in memetics, so memes in posts with memetic
    > topics will have a better chance of generating a thread; and also
    > there is an imposed constraint that the posts should talk about
    > memetics, if not the replicating agent is eliminated. This sort
    > of guarantees that memetics stays as the main topic of posts.
    > However we, the replicating agents, are also interested in many
    > other subjects in common, such as politics. So when another topic
    > pops up, there is a certain chance that it can catch on, which
    > happens sometimes.
    >
    > So in my view, what we are seeing here is a case of memetic
    > engineering vs. memetic evolution. On the one hand, the list is
    > trying to evolve by incorporating successful memes, whatever
    > their topic, and on the other we (acting now as engineers, and
    > not as replicating agents) are trying to keep it on a certain
    > course lest it loose its purpose, namely to discuss memetics.
    >
    > I will not get into if Bruce Edmonds' comments were warranted or
    > not in this particular instance, but we should all be aware that
    > letting evolution do its stuff yields fascinating and marvelous
    > new organisms (or memeplexes), but that the result is utterly
    > unpredictable. If we have a certain purpose for our creation, it
    > will be inevitable that once in a while we will have to roll up
    > our sleeves and mess consciously with the course that it is
    > taking.
    >
    >
    > Keo Ormsby
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    -- 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Chris Taylor (christ@ebi.ac.uk)
      HUPO PSI: GPS -- psidev.sf.net
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 02 Dec 2004 - 23:31:47 GMT