Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA28031 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:46:56 +0100 Subject: RE: Cons and Facades Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:44:13 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20000627194421.AAA12379@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 06/27/00 15:22, Richard Brodie said this-
>I don't think that's an accurate statement, Wade, not for most of the
>proponents of such things.
They have offered 'scientific' proof. That's as accurate as I can get.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 27 2000 - 20:47:41 BST