RE: Cons and Facades

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 19:21:31 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: FW: Cons and Facades - more on truth Pt. I" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA20491 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:24:28 +0100
Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:21:31 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000626182138.AAA4489@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 06/26/00 11:45, Chris Lofting said this-

    >BOTH astrology and NLP use dichotomisations in their determination of
    >meaning and this process ENSURES the emergence of meaning.

    I _am_ missing the point, them, because I am asking for the empirical,
    experimental proof of the above assertion, and I'm not interested in the
    meaning _within_ the respective cultures of NLP, or astrology, (or
    phrenology or tea-leaf-reading, et al.), I'm asking for the proof across
    cultures, within the universal reach of science.

    Take me into the tent.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 19:25:24 BST