RE: NLP & memes

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Sat Jun 24 2000 - 10:37:35 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Darwinism and evolutionary economics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA07911 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:34:48 +0100
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: NLP & memes
    Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:37:35 +1000
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIAEPCCGAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006240119460.28947-100000@marlowe.umd.edu>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Lawrence H. de Bivort
    > Sent: Saturday, 24 June 2000 3:23
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: NLP & memes
    >
    >
    >
    > Chris, would you consider NLP programming (of, say, a state) to be an
    > example of a meme being transmitted? Or, in other words, is an NLP
    > intervention the same as a memetic one?
    >

    Umm.. a possible interpretation. The NLP practitioner has a set of general
    algorithms that can be applied and the 1:1 session allows for these to be
    particularised but all of this process is based within a context set by NLP
    is general. The trance states that can be used DO manifest the meme approach
    in that the trance acts to bypass the 'wall' of a person's persona, it
    utilises the wave approach to getting the message across as does advertising
    by using familiar songs etc and uses the general form to transport the
    modified words that contain the message.; best way to get through a wall,
    use a wave.

    However, there is a lot of NLP that deals with not so much a transmission of
    an object that is 'stand alone' and operates independently 'in here' but
    more so the re-interpretation of an interal experience, the contents of
    which is not required to be known by the practitioner. Thus the only change
    is the individual's manipulation of sensory systems from within and applied
    to something else from within i.e. a memory. I think memes are not so
    cooperative? :-)

    In this sense the particulars are taken care of by the individual, the
    practitioner works with the general. I suppose this is guided
    self-programming that is controlled by both parties whereas a meme has an
    element of the 'un guided' about it in that you can do little about it but
    react; Perhaps NLP could be used to REMOVE a meme :-) but then perhaps that
    could be interpreted as one meme replacing another!?

    In the transmission process I think there is the recognition of the meme as
    being a self-contained 'unit' like a virus that then utilises the
    individual's resources to replicate itself outside of the control of the
    individual. The usual NLP approach is to give the individual control of
    their resources -- to give them choice and so be more proactive than
    reactive. Is that mission a meme in itself? I think the more relationships
    oriented you are the more of a chance you will pass on a meme or be
    susceptable to them since the orientation requires a loose persona barrier
    and so a degree of trust in others. Object oriented are more distrusting of
    others (gets into the SAMENESS/DIFFERENCE dichotomy touched on the recent
    evolution post).

    In a 1:many situation, where the 1 is someone like Tony Robbins or whomever
    (Hitler?), there is a 'wave' approach used in the form of motivational
    patterns that can make the meetings very 'ra ra' in that the playing with
    voice highs and lows etc can create a rhythm effect that gets through the
    persona barrier (especially of the more relational oriented) and combined
    with the local feedback from other people around you gets you stirred up and
    this is meme-like and when linked to symbols the recall is so immediate when
    the symbol is seen elsewhere that response is uncontrolable and so total.
    See Tony Robbins videos or else the film of Hilter's gymnasium speech circa
    1933 (?). (NO I am NOT linking Robbins to Fascism, just the METHOD of
    communication).

    NLP techniques aimed at the particular can be used to refine these abilities
    to 'stir' the masses although as others have said there is a degree of old
    ideas in new clothes. :-)

    best,

    Chris.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 24 2000 - 23:35:36 BST