Re: the meme/brain problem

From: M Lissack (lissacktravel@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat 31 Jan 2004 - 22:30:34 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: the meme/brain problem"

    Ted writes:
    "Its [memetics]role as a social science is to help clarify the mechanics of cultural evolution."

    if this is the case then memetics has to have a unit of analysis which can have a describable and observable mechanics

    if all we have is "black box" mechanics we have clarified nothing

    --- Dace <edace@earthlink.net> wrote:
    > > From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@rogers.com>
    > >
    > > At 09:31 PM 30/01/04 -0500, jeremy wrote:
    > >
    > > snip
    > >
    > > > Lashley's (1950)
    > > >thirty-year research agenda suggests that memes
    > cannot be "a [distinct]
    > > >pattern
    > > >in the brain". Lashley found that the brain is a
    > learning machine, with
    > all
    > > >areas acting as worthy substitutes for any other
    > area; lesions reduce
    > > >learning
    > > >in proportional amounts (i.e., more destruction
    > of brain, greater
    > > >complexity of
    > > >task --> more disruption).
    > >
    > > I am familiar with this work. It does not present
    > any problems for memes
    > > being patterns, even distinct patterns in the
    > brain. I could use
    > holograms
    > > as an example, or better, Stego. A friend of
    > mine, Romano Mochado, wrote
    > > this program which distributes the bits of a
    > message into the lowest bits
    > > of a large graphic image. The fact that you can't
    > see a text file
    > > distributed into the low bits of an image does not
    > prevent it from being
    > > there.
    > >
    > > Same way with memories or learning. They
    > certainly are distributed widely
    > > in the brain. There is also no doubt whatsoever
    > that they are there.
    >
    > An idea, whether remembered or just now learned,
    > cannot exist in physical
    > form. The problem is that atoms and molecules, no
    > matter how they're
    > arranged, consist only of themselves. The rule for
    > matter is simple: A = A.
    > Ideas, on the other hand, involve "symbol" or "sign"
    > or "representation."
    > The rule for representation is quite different: A =
    > B.
    >
    > You will never get a set of atoms, regardless of how
    > complex the pattern
    > into which they're arranged, to represent another
    > set of atoms. The pattern
    > of atoms is simply itself, nothing more, nothing
    > less. This is the cruel
    > lesson of physics, and there are no exceptions.
    >
    > We apply our naturalistic understanding to the
    > farthest-flung reaches of the
    > universe, but when it comes to the contents of our
    > own heads, we toss out
    > everything we know, finding in brains a mystical
    > property that exempts them
    > from otherwise ironclad rules. Everywhere else A =
    > A. But peer inside the
    > skull, and suddenly A = B.
    >
    > When we look at ourselves from the external point of
    > view-- the way a
    > chemist would examine us-- we find no ideas and no
    > memes, only atoms and
    > chemicals arranged in patterns. It's only when we
    > reflect on ourselves
    > directly, from our own point of view, that we find
    > minds and ideas and
    > memes.
    >
    > What gets us into trouble is our linguistic-based
    > tendency to posit separate
    > identities for "mind" and "brain." We think we're
    > dealing with two things
    > here, one of which is necessarily illusory and
    > therefore reducible to the
    > other. In fact, neither is reducible to the other
    > because there's only one
    > thing to begin with. "Brain" is "mind" from the
    > external point of view,
    > while "mind" is "brain" from the internal point of
    > view.
    >
    > Memetics requires the internal point of view and
    > cannot ever be reconciled
    > with a strictly external, physicalist understanding.
    > It will never be a
    > "hard" science in the sense of physics and
    > chemistry. Its role as a social
    > science is to help clarify the mechanics of cultural
    > evolution.
    >
    > Ted
    >
    >
    >
    >
    ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list
    > associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of
    > Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g.
    > unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 31 Jan 2004 - 22:42:04 GMT