From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@rogers.com)
Date: Tue 27 Jan 2004 - 15:46:19 GMT
At 08:33 PM 26/01/04 -0500, Scott wrote:
><Keith>
>
>>So from usage memetics comes out ahead by on the order of 100 to one (at 
>>this time).
snip
>What sort of criterion is hits on google beyond being a popularity 
>contest? Does popularity translate to validity?
In matter of this sort, yes.  If you use the more common word where there 
are equal choices your message is more likely to be understood.
For example, "culturgen" has the exact same meaning as meme.
Lecture 14 – Culture and Evolution
... Culture consists of bits of information sometimes called culturgens.
· Culturgens can be spread both horizontally and vertically ...
www.wsu.edu/~jrasic/lec14.htm - 63k - Cached - Similar pages
culturgen OR culturgens gets 280 hits.  Adding meme only cuts the hits to 
194, indicating that most uses are in the context of discussing its similar 
meaning.  In spite of the prestige of the coiners of "culturgen" it came in 
a distant second to meme.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/g/e/gec7/Memes.pdf
"A substantial part of the concern over the units of cultural transmission 
derives from
analogies made between cultural evolution and biological evolution. Though 
the unit of
selection in biological evolution is still hotly debated (some choosing the 
gene, most
preferring the individual, and a few still holding out for the group), many 
researchers
interested in cultural evolution have seen the need to adopt a particulate 
unit of cultural
transmission that is analogous to the gene. Hence, in recent years, several 
have been
proposed. The most notable of these include Lumsden and Wilson’s (1981) 
“culturgen”
and the “meme,” originally proposed by Dawkins (1976). Of these two, the 
“meme” has
apparently has been “selected.” Durham (1991), for example, has adopted it 
as the unit of
cultural transmission in his theory of coevolution while several 
individuals outside of
anthropology (e.g., Blackmore 1999; Dennett 1991, 1995; Lynch 1996) have 
embraced the
notion with few apparent misgivings. Some have even proposed a new field of 
“memetics”
(e.g., Lynch 1996; Blackmore 1998). Wilson (1998) has abandoned his “culturgen”
construct and adopted the meme, although his definition of it differs in 
significant ways
from definitions proposed by others."
In spite of *Dawkin's* preference for "memics," "memetics" (first suggested 
by Arel Lucas--my wife--to Douglas Hofstadter after his 1983 Scientific 
American column) has won out in the cultural selection 
process.  Speculation as to why would be interesting, the term's obvious 
mental resonance pairing with "genetics" may be a factor.
Keith Henson
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 27 Jan 2004 - 16:05:09 GMT