From: Van oost Kenneth (kennethvanoost@belgacom.net)
Date: Thu 22 Jan 2004 - 21:02:33 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: M Lissack
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:05 AM
>the question is do memes replicate or are they the semiotic sign of
>something else that replicates?
<<Are you saying that we 're looking at the wrong marker !?
That the genes that we end up with are NOT important, but the
ones left out ( a kind of Apoptosis) are !?
That thus the memes we end up ( the meme of racism) is NOT
important but what it leaves behind ( flow, meanings, characte-
ristics, pressures, social orders,...) is !?
Looks to me as an obvious thought !
Following your line of thinking I would agree with the notion that
then memes " live " ' by having a life by '...but than I sway again
direction ' performative acts ' for the propagation of the meme-
as- sign for something else/ replicator.
The meme of racism has no success if NOONe is sitting on the
park bench saying " whites only ". It is an empty reminder of
something existing without its performative assumptions for what
it stands for, or can, or will.....
Regards,
Kenneth
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 22 Jan 2004 - 21:10:40 GMT