From: derek gatherer (dgatherer2002@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri 01 Aug 2003 - 08:53:33 GMT
--- AaronLynch@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated
the
> following definition given by Richard Dawkins in
> 1982 in
> _The Extended Phenotype_, where he states:
>
> "I define a _replicator_ as anything in the universe
> of
> which copies are made." (p. 83)
But on page 84 he qualifies this extensively with the
notions of longevity, fecundity and fidelity. That's
why genes are replicators but chromosomes and
individual nucleotides aren't, even though they get copied.
________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 01 Aug 2003 - 09:05:38 GMT