Re: meaning and divining systems

From: Lawrence H. de Bivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Sun Jun 18 2000 - 20:14:08 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Events we never saw"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA15484 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:15:53 +0100
    X-Authentication-Warning: marple.umd.edu: debivort owned process doing -bs
    Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 15:14:08 -0400 (EDT)
    From: "Lawrence H. de Bivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    X-Sender: debivort@marple.umd.edu
    To: Memetics <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: meaning and divining systems
    In-Reply-To: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIOEMFCGAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006181512260.23772-100000@marple.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Interesting! Do you think it is possible for the brain or how we make
    meaning to handle more than two poles? To handle, say three or four
    taxonomic options in the same way you describe here?

    - Lawrence

    On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Chris Lofting wrote:

    >Hi all,
    >
    >FYI I have added a program to my eisa website dealing with the establishment
    >of 'meaning' from an esoteric system, in particular the I Ching.
    >
    >My arguement in this is that ANY method of categorisation based on the use
    >of dichotomies will create a sense of 'meaning' since these methods are
    >based on the method our brain uses and as such these methods serve as
    >metaphors for describing object/relationships interactions at a particular
    >level.
    >
    >The I Ching is a good example of this where random generation of symbols is
    >'meaningless' until you ask a particular question. The I Ching symbols
    >reflect harmonics and the particular question grounds these harmonics, the
    >question acts like a key in music and your brain-mind will start to make
    >associations etc. These aids in analysis have become externalised, taking on
    >a life of their own and as such are taken literally rather than as metaphors
    >used to particularise meaning.
    >
    >see http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting/indexJ.html for the intro and some
    >background comments. There are also some essays on the site re randomness
    >and meaning that I think may help flesh-out the idea I am presenting.
    >
    >best,
    >
    >Chris.
    >
    >------------------
    >Chris Lofting
    >websites:
    >http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    >http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
    >

    |---------------------------------------------|
    | ESI |
    | Evolutionary Services Institute |
    | "Crafting opportunities for a better world" |
    | 5504 Scioto Road, Bethesda, MD 20816, USA |
    | (301) 320-3941 |
    |---------------------------------------------|

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 18 2000 - 20:16:39 BST