Re: Encoding

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon 07 Jul 2003 - 19:56:08 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Encoding"

    Date sent: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 09:03:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Encoding From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade.t.smith@verizon.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    >
    > On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 04:53 PM, Joe wrote:
    >
    > > You're still missing the point that all of the DIFFERENT methods can
    > > communicate the SELFSAME MEME.
    >
    > This is an unproved and, as of yet, unprovable _axiom_ of the
    > memeinthemind models.
    >
    > It is not an axiom of any of the memenotinthemind models.
    >
    Wade is now reduced to maintaining that reading a written message and hearing the same message spoken cannot possibly communicate that selfsame message. He is also reduced to arguing that "God is love" and "God is loathed" are necessarily closer together in meaning than "God is love" and "God is infinite caring" because they unquestionably are more similar performances. These are the patent and blatant absurdities to which one is inexorably led when one follows the postulated premises of the memeisthemotion model to their strange conclusions.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 07 Jul 2003 - 20:02:48 GMT