Re: Meme definition

From: Chris Taylor (Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri 20 Jun 2003 - 23:21:42 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: venue examples"

    Sorry. Gotta correct my tired self -

    > Evolutionary psychology holds that *genes* (i.e. innate stuff from
    encoded bits of brain 'ROM') affect behaviour to a
    > meaningful degree (different practitioners draw the line differently,
    > pinker is a sneaky smiling man who talks a lot of sense but insists on
    > polluting it with caveman twaddle). Memetics doesn't need that. It is
    > not inconceivable that we could demarcate the tiny basal bits of innate
    > behaviour, then we know where we are with the rest.

    Chris Taylor wrote:
    > Evolutionary psychology holds that the brain affects behaviour to a
    > meaningful degree (different practitioners draw the line differently,
    > pinker is a sneaky smiling man who talks a lot of sense but insists on
    > polluting it with caveman twaddle). Memetics doesn't need that. It is
    > not inconceivable that we could demarcate the tiny basal bits of innate
    > behaviour, then we know where we are with the rest.
    >
    > Richard Brodie wrote:
    >
    >> Scott wrote:
    >>
    >> <<Chris could think evolutionary psychology is bunk, yet still hold
    >> that the
    >> mindbrain is a product of evolution (including the process of
    >> selection).>>
    >>
    >> No... I don't think so. That's what evolutionary psychology is.
    >>
    >> Perhaps he disagrees only with certain wacko nutcases who write nonsense
    >> under the rubric of evo-psych, much as some do under our own roof.
    >>
    >> <<I think Chris's point is that his belief in memetics as an
    >> explanation of
    >> human culture supercedes evolutionary psychological explanations,
    >> which tend
    >> to root human behavior pretty deeply in some hypothesized environment of
    >> evolutionary adaptedness (EEA) and discount the importance of
    >> socifacts in
    >> their own right. An emphasis on the efficacy of cultural factors is
    >> not an
    >> advocacy of an intelligent designer.>>
    >>
    >> Psychology is fundamental to memetics. Viewing the mind as having evolved
    >> through genetic evolution is a good idea, I think, but other models
    >> are also
    >> possible. Obviously a memeticist will not discount the influence of
    >> culture
    >> on behavior.
    >>
    >> Interestingly, you used "supercede," a word spelled in the dictionary as
    >> "supersede." It is in fact the only English word ending in "sede." The
    >> "cede" meme won in your mind and you propagated it.
    >>
    >> Richard Brodie
    >> www.memecentral.com
    >>
    >>
    >> ===============================================================
    >> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >>
    >

    -- 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
      http://pedro.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 20 Jun 2003 - 23:30:13 GMT