RE: Precision of replication

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri 20 Jun 2003 - 01:42:27 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "RE: Precision of replication"

    >From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@rogers.com>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: RE: Precision of replication
    >Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:08:45 -0400
    >
    >At 09:30 AM 19/06/03 -0700, Richard wrote:
    >>Lawry wrote:
    >
    >snip
    >
    >><<Richard, is it your thought that memeplexes and memes behave differently
    >>when it comes to transmission and replication? I have looked at the case
    >>in
    >>which only a subset of the memes in a memeplex are transmitted, and what
    >>effect that has, but short of this I have been proceeding on the
    >>assumption
    >>that a memeplex is essentially just a 'big meme' when it comes to
    >>transmission.>>
    >>
    >>I think you've put your finger on it. It makes no sense to talk about a
    >>meme
    >>being transmitted with less than 100% fidelity unless you are talking
    >>about
    >>mutation. With a memeplex, you might be interested in less than
    >>100%-fidelity transmission as long as the receiving mind exhibits similar
    >>behavior as a result of sharing the memeplex.
    >
    >A bit of borrowed model and some examples might help here.
    >
    >Meme transmission between people is through a classic Shannon information
    >transmission channel. That channel is severely limited as to bandwidth (a
    >few bits per second) and noisy. As was mentioned on this thread, errors
    >creep in at the transmit end, the channel, and the receive end.
    >
    >The way errors are corrected in electronic communications is through check
    >sums and retransmission. I.e., you test that the information got through
    >without error and send it again if it had errors.
    >
    >Something very much like this is done in teaching children where there is a
    >cycle of feeding information to the children, testing and repeating until
    >you verify that the information has made the jump to the child's mind. I
    >suppose the way a word is spelled could be considered a minimal kind of
    >meme--in which case children learn many thousands of them to a high degree
    >of accuracy and are tested and corrected on spelling constantly (perhaps
    >less today with the advent of spell checkers). [Spelling tends to be
    >highly constrained by dictionaries, but even there you can see minor
    >spelling drifts and divergences, night -> nite, plough -> plow, and color
    >-> colour.]
    >
    >Now the fewer bits being transmitted the better the information fidelity.
    >Thus short words are misspelled less frequently than longer ones and you
    >have hundreds of millions of people who know "three strikes and four balls"
    >meme that is part of the "memeplex" of baseball but far fewer of them know
    >the fine points of a catcher dropping the ball on the third strike. [I
    >don't feel the need for the term but I recognize that some feel they need
    >for a name for complexes of memes. If I felt the need, I would favor
    >Hofstedter's term, "a scheme of memes." :-) ]
    >
    >Thus meme transmission is *never* free of errors. But with lots of error
    >checking and retransmission, the errors can be reduced to arbitrarily small
    >differences.
    >
    >I might add that DNA replication is *also* subjected to error checking and
    >correction by a collection of molecular machines.
    >
    >Most of the time memes get replicated "good enough." Long as you
    >understand what is going on it is not something to fuss over.
    >
    Many of my posts are good examples of how speeling errors get transmitted but the receiver hopefully relizes which words were intended. Perhap this is a post-transmission error correction mechanism. I blame my keyboard for the pre-transmission stuff.

    _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 20 Jun 2003 - 01:51:00 GMT